๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐’ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ - ATM
๐๐๐๐
 ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐’ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ 
๐๐๐๐๐๐
House Speaker Martin Romualdez was depicted today as
 a greedy giant octopus with tentacles that strangle the ordinary 
Filipino as environmental activists and civil society leaders exposed 
today his mining interests and criticized him for pushing for charter 
change.
During a press conference launching Alyansa Tigil Mina’s 
Anti-Mining Solidarity Week, ATM National Coordinator Jaybee Garganera 
shared ATM’s study that found Speaker Martin Romualdez as having links 
with mining companies, namely Benguet Corporation (BC) and Marcventures 
Holdings Inc. (MHI).
“The Romualdez family are very cunning in 
hiding their ownership of the mining companies. But although the paper 
trail finds that no Romualdez is named as beneficial owner, the study 
reveals that the Romualdez family has a considerable level of control in
 the mining firms,” Garganera said.
According to the study, this 
level of control is evidenced by: 1) the presence of certain family 
members and close Romualdez allies on the board of several firms across 
the ownership chain, (2) the interconnectedness of their management, and
 (3) the link of the Romualdez’ family with the networks and flow of 
influence which ultimately shaped the firms’ current ownership 
structures throughout the years.
In a recorded video message, 
Prof. Cielo Magno of the UP School of Economics, said Romualdez and his 
cohorts have been using mining as an excuse to amend the constitution 
when it has already been liberalized in 2004 through the La Bugal case. 
 She said the mining sector is actually an evidence of how 
liberalization is not enough to address the problems in a sector like 
mining.
Meanwhile, Atty. Christian Monsod, former Comelec Chair, 
said that a proposal to shift to a parliamentary system would enable 
incumbent officials to stay in power without term limits, such as Prime 
Minister who is elected by Parliament and not directly by the people.
“There
 is absolutely no justifiable reason for amending the charter. We have a
 progressive Constitution that has strong social justice provisions and 
safeguards against dictatorial rule. As for foreign direct investments, 
there is no requirement of charter change to implement the Philippine 
Development Plan 2023-2028 nor in availing of the $73 billion investment
 pledges secured by the President in his trips abroad. And laws like RA 
11647, RA 11659, RA 9136 and others show that there is resilience to the
 times with the 1987 Constitution,” he said.
“The problem is not the Constitution, it’s in not implementing it fully,” Atty. Monsod concluded.
Fr.
 Tony Labiao, Executive-Secretary of Caritas Philippines, called on the 
public to be vigilant about the deceptive moves of politicians 
concerning charter change. “The people must exercise good judgement and 
not be misled by the maneuverings of the proponents of charter change. 
They should look through the real agenda behind ChaCha and strongly 
reject any revision to the Constitution.
Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=393033206689231&set=a.230714322921121 

Comments
Post a Comment